In addition, the Rankings make certain assumptions and weightings, and other assumptions or weightings could lead to materially different results. Inclusion of such private equity funds could materially affect the relative positioning of the private equity firms shown in the Rankings. In particular, the Rankings do not include the results of private equity funds that were raised prior to or subsequent to the cut-off dates specified in the criteria for such Rankings.

The Rankings do not include information on all applicable private equity funds available for investment or all vintages of such private equity funds and therefore are necessarily incomplete. Source: Pitchbook News & Analysis, Top SaaS Investor Since 2011, January 2016.ĭisclosures: Certain performance rankings described herein (the “Rankings”), including but not limited to the 20 HEC-Dow Jones Private Equity Performance Ranking, were prepared by third parties using data, including but not limited to fund performance data, gathered through surveys, databases and other sources. There can be no assurance that historical trends will continue during the life of any VEP fund. Note: Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results. Current and prior Vista Portfolio Companies as of.

There can be no assurance that historical trends will continue during the life of any Vista fund.ģ. Includes all current Vista Equity Partners portfolio companies ranked against public software companies as measured by LTM EBITDA. See Disclosures for more information regarding rankings.Ģ. HEC-Dow Jones 2016 ranking based off of PE firms that raised funds during the 2003 to 2012 period. HEC-Dow Jones 2015 ranking based off of PE firms that raised funds during the 2002 to 2011 period. HEC-Dow Jones 2014 ranking based off of PE firms that raised funds during the 2000 to 2009 period. Reflects HEC-Dow Jones 2014, 2015, and 2016 annual rankings.

Vista equity partners review